Harmonic Response Analysis

Understanding Harmonic Response Analysis in Modern Engineering

When structures and mechanical systems are subjected to oscillating forces, their response can range from negligible vibrations to catastrophic resonance failures. Harmonic response analysis, also known as frequency response analysis, is a critical simulation technique that enables engineers to predict how structures will behave under sustained cyclic loading conditions. For industries across Atlantic Canada—from offshore energy platforms to manufacturing facilities—understanding and applying this analysis method is essential for ensuring structural integrity and operational reliability.

At its core, harmonic response analysis solves the equations of motion for a system subjected to sinusoidal excitation at various frequencies. Unlike transient dynamic analysis, which examines response to time-varying loads, harmonic analysis focuses specifically on steady-state behaviour, making it computationally efficient and particularly valuable for assessing fatigue life, noise and vibration characteristics, and resonance risks.

The Technical Foundations of Harmonic Analysis

Harmonic response analysis is grounded in the fundamental equation of motion for a damped system under harmonic excitation:

{ü} + {u̇} + {u} = {F}sin(ωt)

Where represents the mass matrix, the damping matrix, the stiffness matrix, {u} the displacement vector, {F} the force amplitude, and ω the excitation frequency. The steady-state solution assumes the response will also be harmonic at the same frequency as the input, though potentially with different amplitude and phase.

Modern finite element analysis (FEA) software packages employ three primary solution methods for harmonic response:

• Full Method: Directly solves the coupled equations using the full system matrices, providing the most accurate results but requiring significant computational resources. This method supports all types of loading and damping and is ideal for systems with non-symmetric matrices.

• Mode Superposition Method: Uses mode shapes from a prior modal analysis to uncouple the equations of motion, dramatically reducing solution time. Typically requires only 10-20% of the computational effort compared to the full method whilst maintaining excellent accuracy for most engineering applications.

• Variational Technology Method: Employs advanced iterative solvers that can handle very large models (exceeding 1 million degrees of freedom) with reasonable computational times, making it suitable for complex assemblies common in marine and offshore structures.

The frequency range of interest typically spans from a fraction of the first natural frequency to several multiples of the highest mode expected to be excited. For most industrial machinery and structural applications, this range falls between 0.1 Hz and 2,000 Hz, though specialised applications may extend to 10,000 Hz or beyond.

Critical Applications in Maritime and Industrial Sectors

The Maritime provinces' diverse industrial landscape presents numerous scenarios where harmonic response analysis proves indispensable. Understanding these applications helps engineering teams identify when this analytical approach should be incorporated into their design validation process.

Rotating Machinery and Equipment

Nova Scotia's manufacturing sector relies heavily on rotating equipment—pumps, compressors, fans, and motors—that generate harmonic forces during normal operation. A typical industrial motor operating at 1,750 RPM produces primary excitation at 29.2 Hz, with harmonics at 58.3 Hz, 87.5 Hz, and higher multiples. Harmonic response analysis allows engineers to ensure that support structures, piping systems, and connected equipment do not have natural frequencies coinciding with these excitation frequencies.

For instance, a fish processing facility in Lunenburg required analysis of their refrigeration compressor mounting system after experiencing excessive vibration complaints. The harmonic response study revealed a structural resonance at 118 Hz, precisely matching the fourth harmonic of the compressor operating speed. By modifying the support stiffness through strategic bracing, the resonant frequency was shifted to 145 Hz, reducing vibration amplitudes by 73%.

Offshore and Marine Structures

Atlantic Canada's offshore energy sector, including emerging tidal power installations in the Bay of Fundy, subjects structures to periodic loading from wave action, current-induced vortex shedding, and equipment operation. Wave frequencies typically range from 0.05 Hz to 0.3 Hz, whilst vortex shedding from cylindrical members can excite frequencies from 0.1 Hz to 10 Hz depending on current velocity and member diameter.

The relationship governing vortex shedding frequency is defined by the Strouhal number: f = (St × V) / D, where St ≈ 0.2 for cylindrical sections, V is flow velocity, and D is the member diameter. For a 0.5-metre diameter pile in a 2 m/s tidal current, this yields an excitation frequency of approximately 0.8 Hz—well within the range of typical structural natural frequencies for jacket structures and monopiles.

Wind Energy Infrastructure

With Nova Scotia's commitment to renewable energy expansion, wind turbine foundations and towers require careful harmonic analysis. A typical 3 MW turbine with a rotor speed of 6-16 RPM generates primary excitation frequencies of 0.1-0.27 Hz (1P frequency) and blade passing frequencies of 0.3-0.8 Hz (3P frequency for three-bladed rotors). The tower and foundation system must be designed to avoid these frequency ranges whilst also considering the aerodynamic damping that significantly affects response amplitudes.

Practical Implementation and Analysis Workflow

Executing a successful harmonic response analysis requires careful attention to model preparation, boundary conditions, and post-processing interpretation. The following workflow represents industry best practices refined through extensive project experience.

Model Preparation and Meshing Considerations

The finite element mesh must adequately capture the mode shapes within the frequency range of interest. As a general guideline, elements should be small enough to represent at least six elements per wavelength at the highest frequency analysed. For steel structures with a longitudinal wave speed of approximately 5,100 m/s, analysing up to 500 Hz requires element sizes no larger than 1.7 metres for adequate wavelength resolution.

Mass distribution accuracy is equally critical, as it directly affects natural frequency predictions. Point masses representing equipment should be properly connected to the structure using appropriate constraint equations or rigid body elements that realistically distribute forces without artificially stiffening the response.

Damping Specification

Damping significantly influences harmonic response amplitudes, particularly near resonance conditions. Engineers must carefully specify appropriate damping values based on the physical system:

• Welded steel structures: 1-2% of critical damping

• Bolted steel connections: 2-4% of critical damping

• Reinforced concrete: 3-5% of critical damping

• Soil-structure interaction: 5-15% of critical damping

• Machinery on isolation mounts: 5-10% of critical damping

For complex assemblies combining multiple materials and connection types, frequency-dependent damping or Rayleigh damping (combining mass and stiffness proportional components) provides more accurate representation than constant modal damping ratios.

Loading Definition and Frequency Sweep Parameters

Harmonic loads can be specified as concentrated forces, pressures, or base accelerations. The frequency sweep should span from at least 50% below the lowest natural frequency of interest to 30% above the highest anticipated excitation frequency. Frequency step size requires particular attention near resonance conditions—steps of 0.5-1% of the natural frequency are recommended within ±10% of identified resonance peaks, whilst coarser steps of 5-10% suffice in non-resonant regions.

Many modern FEA packages support automatic frequency clustering near resonance points, significantly reducing computational effort whilst maintaining accuracy where it matters most.

Interpreting Results and Engineering Decision-Making

Harmonic response analysis produces substantial output data requiring careful interpretation. Primary results include displacement, velocity, and acceleration frequency response functions (FRFs), along with stress and strain amplitudes throughout the frequency range.

Frequency Response Function Analysis

The FRF plot reveals critical information about system behaviour. Peaks in the response indicate resonance conditions, with the sharpness of peaks (Q-factor) inversely related to damping. A Q-factor of 50 (corresponding to 1% damping) produces peak amplitudes 50 times greater than the quasi-static response, highlighting the potential severity of resonance conditions.

Phase information, often overlooked, provides crucial insight into response characteristics. A 90-degree phase shift at resonance confirms the resonant nature of the response, whilst phase relationships between different response locations indicate mode shape behaviour and can identify whether responses will add constructively or cancel.

Stress Evaluation and Fatigue Implications

For fatigue-critical applications, harmonic stress amplitudes must be evaluated against appropriate allowable values. The Canadian Standards Association's CSA S16 for steel structures and CSA S6 for bridges provide guidance on fatigue resistance based on detail category and number of anticipated stress cycles.

A structure subjected to continuous harmonic loading at 30 Hz accumulates approximately 946 million cycles annually. Even modest stress amplitudes can lead to fatigue failures under such conditions, making accurate harmonic response prediction essential for reliable fatigue life estimation.

Advanced Considerations and Emerging Techniques

Contemporary engineering practice continues to evolve harmonic analysis methodologies to address increasingly complex challenges facing Atlantic Canadian industry.

Multi-Excitation and Random Vibration Correlation

Real-world systems often experience multiple simultaneous harmonic excitations at different frequencies. Advanced analysis techniques account for the superposition of these responses, including potential beating phenomena when excitation frequencies are closely spaced. Additionally, harmonic analysis results can be combined with random vibration analysis using power spectral density methods for comprehensive dynamic assessment.

Nonlinear Harmonic Analysis

Whilst traditional harmonic analysis assumes linear system behaviour, emerging techniques extend these capabilities to mildly nonlinear systems through harmonic balance methods and multi-harmonic approaches. These advanced methods address situations involving preloaded bolted joints, clearance gaps, and material nonlinearities that increasingly appear in sophisticated mechanical systems.

Coupled Multi-Physics Applications

Acoustic-structural coupling enables harmonic analysis to predict noise radiation from vibrating structures—a critical consideration for marine vessels, industrial enclosures, and building mechanical systems. Similarly, fluid-structure interaction capabilities allow assessment of hydroelastic effects relevant to tidal turbines and offshore platforms operating in the challenging Atlantic environment.

Ensuring Project Success Through Expert Analysis

Harmonic response analysis represents a powerful tool in the structural engineer's analytical arsenal, but its effective application requires deep understanding of both theoretical foundations and practical implementation considerations. From mesh refinement strategies to damping characterisation and results interpretation, each step demands engineering judgement refined through extensive experience.

For organisations operating in Nova Scotia and the broader Atlantic region, access to qualified engineering expertise ensures that harmonic analysis studies deliver actionable insights supporting safe, efficient, and reliable structural and mechanical systems. Whether addressing vibration concerns in existing facilities, validating new equipment installations, or supporting the region's growing renewable energy infrastructure, professional harmonic response analysis provides the technical foundation for confident engineering decisions.

Sangster Engineering Ltd. provides comprehensive harmonic response analysis services from our Amherst, Nova Scotia headquarters, serving clients throughout the Maritime provinces and Atlantic Canada. Our engineering team combines advanced finite element analysis capabilities with practical industry experience to deliver thorough, cost-effective vibration assessments. Contact us today to discuss how harmonic response analysis can support your next project and ensure your structures and equipment perform reliably under dynamic loading conditions.

Partner with Sangster Engineering

At Sangster Engineering Ltd. in Amherst, Nova Scotia, we bring decades of engineering experience to every project. Serving clients across Atlantic Canada and beyond.

Contact us today to discuss your engineering needs.