Design for Reliability

Understanding Design for Reliability: A Foundation for Product Excellence

In today's competitive manufacturing landscape, product reliability isn't merely a desirable attribute—it's a fundamental requirement that separates market leaders from those struggling to maintain customer confidence. Design for Reliability (DfR) represents a systematic engineering approach that integrates reliability considerations into every phase of product development, from initial concept through manufacturing and field deployment.

For manufacturers across Atlantic Canada, where industries ranging from marine equipment to renewable energy systems demand products that perform flawlessly in harsh environmental conditions, understanding and implementing DfR principles has never been more critical. The cost of field failures extends far beyond warranty claims; it encompasses damaged reputations, lost contracts, and the erosion of hard-earned market positions.

At its core, Design for Reliability focuses on predicting, preventing, and mitigating potential failure modes before they manifest in real-world applications. This proactive methodology stands in stark contrast to traditional approaches that often relied on extensive prototype testing and reactive design modifications—approaches that prove both costly and time-consuming in modern product development cycles.

The Economic Case for Reliability Engineering

The financial implications of product reliability extend throughout the entire product lifecycle, making early investment in DfR methodologies one of the most cost-effective decisions engineering teams can make. Industry research consistently demonstrates that addressing reliability issues during the design phase costs approximately 10 to 100 times less than addressing the same issues after production has commenced.

Consider the following cost multipliers that apply when reliability problems are discovered at various stages:

• Concept phase corrections: Base cost factor of 1x

• Design phase corrections: 3x to 8x base cost

• Prototype phase corrections: 15x to 50x base cost

• Production phase corrections: 75x to 250x base cost

• Field failure corrections: 500x to 2,000x base cost

For Nova Scotia manufacturers competing in global markets, these figures underscore the strategic importance of front-loading reliability engineering activities. A Maritime-based producer of industrial equipment, for example, might spend $5,000 addressing a potential bearing failure mode during design review. The same issue discovered after product launch could easily consume $500,000 or more in recalls, field repairs, expedited replacement parts, and customer compensation.

Beyond direct costs, reliability performance directly influences market competitiveness. Products achieving Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) ratings 25% to 50% above industry averages typically command premium pricing of 10% to 20%, while simultaneously reducing warranty reserve requirements and improving customer retention rates.

Core Methodologies in Design for Reliability

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

FMEA remains the cornerstone methodology for systematic reliability engineering. This structured approach identifies potential failure modes, evaluates their effects on system performance, and prioritises corrective actions based on risk assessment. The process assigns numerical ratings to three key factors:

• Severity (S): Rated 1-10, assessing the impact of failure on end users, safety, and regulatory compliance

• Occurrence (O): Rated 1-10, estimating the likelihood of the failure mode manifesting

• Detection (D): Rated 1-10, evaluating the probability that current controls will identify the failure before customer impact

The Risk Priority Number (RPN), calculated as S × O × D, provides a quantitative basis for prioritising design improvements. Industry best practice typically flags any failure mode with RPN exceeding 100-150 for immediate engineering attention, though critical safety applications may use lower thresholds.

Accelerated Life Testing (ALT)

Accelerated Life Testing subjects products to stress conditions significantly exceeding normal operational parameters, enabling engineers to observe failure mechanisms in compressed timeframes. For products designed to operate reliably for 10-15 years—common requirements in industrial applications throughout Atlantic Canada's energy and marine sectors—traditional life testing proves impractical.

ALT methodologies typically employ one or more acceleration factors:

• Thermal cycling: Exposing products to temperature extremes, often ranging from -40°C to +85°C for electronics or -55°C to +125°C for automotive-grade components

• Humidity exposure: Operating at 85% relative humidity combined with elevated temperatures (commonly 85°C) to accelerate corrosion and moisture-related failures

• Mechanical stress: Applying vibration profiles, shock loads, or cyclic mechanical stresses at levels 2x to 10x expected field conditions

• Electrical stress: Operating circuits at elevated voltages, currents, or power levels to accelerate component degradation

The Arrhenius equation and other acceleration models allow engineers to extrapolate test results to predict field reliability with reasonable confidence, provided the acceleration factors don't fundamentally alter failure mechanisms.

Physics of Failure Analysis

Modern reliability engineering increasingly emphasises Physics of Failure (PoF) approaches that analyse the fundamental mechanisms causing component degradation and failure. Rather than treating components as statistical "black boxes," PoF methods examine specific failure physics:

• Fatigue crack propagation in mechanical components

• Electromigration in integrated circuit interconnects

• Corrosion mechanisms in metallic structures

• Polymer degradation in seals, gaskets, and insulating materials

• Wear mechanisms in bearings, gears, and sliding surfaces

This approach proves particularly valuable for products operating in the challenging Maritime environment, where salt air, humidity, and temperature cycling create aggressive conditions that accelerate many degradation mechanisms.

Implementing DfR Throughout the Development Lifecycle

Requirements Definition Phase

Effective reliability engineering begins with clear, quantitative reliability requirements. Vague specifications like "the product shall be reliable" provide no actionable guidance for engineering teams. Instead, requirements should specify measurable targets such as:

• MTBF targets in operating hours or cycles (e.g., minimum 50,000 hours MTBF at 90% confidence level)

• Design life requirements (e.g., 15-year operational life with annual maintenance)

• Environmental operating conditions with specific temperature, humidity, vibration, and shock parameters

• Warranty period targets and maximum acceptable failure rates during warranty

• Safety-critical failure probability limits (e.g., probability of dangerous failure less than 10⁻⁷ per operating hour)

Concept and Preliminary Design

During early design phases, reliability engineering activities focus on architecture-level decisions that fundamentally influence achievable reliability. Key activities include:

Derating analysis ensures components operate well below their maximum ratings. Standard derating guidelines typically limit electronic components to 50-70% of rated voltage, current, and power, while mechanical components may require safety factors of 2.0 to 4.0 depending on application criticality.

Redundancy assessment evaluates where parallel systems or backup components can improve overall reliability. For critical applications, N+1 or N+2 redundancy configurations can improve system availability from 99.9% to 99.999% or higher.

Parts selection applies reliability data from sources such as MIL-HDBK-217, FIDES, or Telcordia SR-332 to choose components with demonstrated reliability in similar applications.

Detailed Design and Analysis

As designs mature, detailed reliability analyses provide quantitative predictions and identify remaining weak points. Reliability block diagrams model system-level reliability based on component data and architectural arrangements. Fault tree analysis examines potential causes of top-level failures, enabling targeted design improvements.

For electronic systems, thermal analysis using computational fluid dynamics or specialised thermal simulation tools identifies hot spots that accelerate component aging. Research indicates that every 10°C reduction in junction temperature approximately doubles semiconductor component life—making thermal management a primary reliability lever.

Validation and Verification

Highly Accelerated Life Testing (HALT) during development deliberately stresses products beyond specification limits to discover fundamental design weaknesses. Unlike qualification testing designed to demonstrate compliance, HALT intentionally seeks failures by progressively increasing stress levels until the product fails.

Typical HALT profiles combine:

• Temperature stepping from +20°C to upper destruct limit (often +120°C to +140°C for electronics)

• Temperature stepping from +20°C to lower destruct limit (often -60°C to -80°C)

• Rapid thermal cycling between temperature extremes

• Six-axis random vibration increasing to 50-60 Grms or higher

• Combined thermal and vibration stresses

Environmental Considerations for Maritime Applications

Products destined for deployment in Nova Scotia and throughout Atlantic Canada face environmental challenges that demand specific reliability engineering attention. The Maritime climate combines several stress factors that accelerate product degradation:

Salt fog and chloride exposure creates aggressive corrosive conditions for metallic components. Effective designs incorporate corrosion-resistant materials (stainless steel grade 316L or higher, marine-grade aluminium alloys), protective coatings, and sealed enclosures meeting IP65 or IP67 ratings as minimum requirements.

Temperature cycling in the region, though less extreme than continental climates, still produces significant thermal stresses. Typical ranges from -25°C winter lows to +35°C summer peaks, combined with high humidity, create conditions conducive to condensation-related failures.

Wind and vibration exposure affects products in coastal installations, offshore platforms, and marine vessels. Design requirements often reference standards such as IEC 60068-2-6 for sinusoidal vibration and IEC 60068-2-64 for random vibration testing.

Local manufacturers serving the offshore energy sector, fishing industry, or marine transportation must incorporate these regional environmental factors into reliability requirements from the earliest design stages.

Integrating Reliability with Manufacturing

Design for Reliability extends beyond product design into manufacturing process design. Highly Accelerated Stress Screening (HASS) applies controlled stresses during production to precipitate latent defects before shipment. Unlike destructive HALT, HASS operates within product specification limits while still accelerating defect detection.

Effective HASS profiles typically achieve detection limits of 95% or higher for infant mortality failures—the early-life failures that most damage customer relationships and brand reputation. Process capability studies ensure manufacturing variation remains within limits that support reliability requirements, typically targeting Cpk values of 1.33 or higher for critical characteristics.

Statistical process control monitors ongoing production quality, enabling rapid response to process drift before it impacts field reliability. For complex products, automated test systems provide 100% functional testing while collecting data that supports continuous reliability improvement.

Building Organisational Capability in Reliability Engineering

Successful DfR implementation requires more than technical methodologies—it demands organisational commitment and appropriate resources. Companies achieving reliability leadership typically invest in:

• Dedicated reliability engineering roles with authority to influence design decisions

• Reliability training for design engineers covering FMEA, statistical analysis, and failure physics

• Test facilities capable of conducting environmental stress testing and accelerated life testing

• Data systems capturing field failure information and enabling root cause analysis

• Design review processes that include formal reliability checkpoints and gate criteria

For smaller engineering organisations, partnering with specialised engineering consultancies provides access to reliability expertise and test capabilities that may not be economically maintained in-house.

Taking Your Product Reliability to the Next Level

Design for Reliability represents a strategic investment that pays dividends throughout the product lifecycle—reducing development costs, minimising warranty exposure, and building the market reputation that drives long-term business success. For Atlantic Canadian manufacturers competing in demanding global markets, DfR capabilities increasingly represent a competitive necessity rather than an optional enhancement.

Sangster Engineering Ltd. brings decades of product development expertise to help Maritime manufacturers implement effective reliability engineering practices. Our team in Amherst, Nova Scotia, understands the unique environmental challenges facing products deployed throughout Atlantic Canada and brings practical experience in FMEA facilitation, reliability prediction, accelerated life testing protocols, and failure analysis.

Whether you're developing a new product and want to build reliability in from the start, or addressing field reliability issues with existing products, we provide the engineering support you need. Contact Sangster Engineering Ltd. today to discuss how our reliability engineering services can strengthen your product development programme and deliver the dependable performance your customers demand.

Partner with Sangster Engineering

At Sangster Engineering Ltd. in Amherst, Nova Scotia, we bring decades of engineering experience to every project. Serving clients across Atlantic Canada and beyond.

Contact us today to discuss your engineering needs.